The Hand Of God

By Theresa Rézeau Few parts of the human body have carried as much symbolic meaning throughout history as the hand. Long before words were written, hands told stories. They blessed, welcomed, warned, healed and comforted. They built cities, painted masterpieces and signed treaties. They also waged wars, inflicted violence and betrayed trust. Across civilisations, the hand has never been merely an anatomical feature. It has been a language, and artists have understood this for centuries. Among the countless masterpieces of Western art, few images capture the symbolic power of the hand more profoundly than The Creation of Adam, painted between 1508 and 1512 on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel by the Italian Renaissance artist Michelangelo Buonarroti (1475–1564). At first glance, the fresco appears remarkably simple. God stretches forward, surrounded by angels, while Adam reclines upon the newly created earth. Their hands reach towards one another, separated by the smallest of distances. That tiny gap has fascinated historians, theologians and artists for more than five hundred years. The fingers do not quite touch. Adam's hand is open, almost passive, while God's reaches towards him with purpose. Humanity exists at the threshold between possibility and fulfilment, the entire mystery of creation concentrated into the space between two fingertips. That single gesture has become one of the most recognisable images in the history of art because it expresses far more than the biblical account of creation. It speaks of relationship, dependence and humanity's longing to reach beyond itself towards something greater. The hand of God is not clenched in judgement or raised in punishment. It is extended. The gesture suggests generosity rather than possession: life is being offered, not taken. Throughout Christian art, hands repeatedly carry this symbolic weight. They bless and heal. They wash the feet of disciples in humility and are pierced upon the cross in sacrifice. Even betrayal is remembered through touch. The same part of the body capable of tenderness can wound, deceive or condemn. Michelangelo understood that a gesture could contain an entire story. Nearly five centuries later, another hand would enter history for a very different reason. On 22 June 1986, more than 114,000 spectators gathered inside the Estadio Azteca in Mexico City for a World Cup quarter-final between Argentina and England. Only four years earlier, the two nations had fought the Falklands War. Football could never resolve the wounds left by that conflict, but for millions watching, the match carried a significance that extended far beyond sport. In the fifty-first minute, Diego Maradona moved towards a high ball inside England's penalty area as goalkeeper Peter Shilton came forward to meet it. Maradona jumped. The ball crossed the line. The referee awarded the goal. Television replays revealed what had happened: Maradona had used his left hand. He later described the goal as scored “a little with the head of Maradona and a little with the hand of God.” The phrase transformed an infringement into mythology. For many Argentinians, particularly in the shadow of the Falklands War, the goal acquired meanings that exceeded the match itself. For England, it remained an act of deception that should never have stood. The same raised hand became triumph to some and injustice to others. But the story becomes far more interesting four minutes later. Maradona received the ball inside his own half and began to run. He moved through England's defence, passed player after player, rounded Shilton and scored a goal that would become one of the most celebrated in the history of the sport. This time there was no hidden hand. Within four minutes, the same player had produced one of football's most infamous acts of deception and one of its most celebrated displays of genius. Had the two moments belonged to different matches or different years, history might have separated them more easily. Instead, they sit almost beside one another, forcing us to confront the contradiction within the same man. Maradona had used deception to achieve what his extraordinary ability proved, only minutes later, he was capable of achieving without it. At this point Michelangelo’s fresco begins to look different. In The Creation of Adam, the drama lies partly in restraint. The fingers approach but do not touch. Michelangelo leaves a fraction of empty space between them, and that space becomes essential to the image. Adam does not grasp. God’s hand does not seize. The power of the gesture lies in what is offered across the distance. Maradona’s gesture reverses that movement. His hand does not wait to receive; it intervenes. It takes an opportunity that the rules of the game did not permit him to take. One hand offers while the other seizes. Yet reducing Maradona to that single act would be too easy, because four minutes later he complicated the judgement himself. His second goal required no deception. It demonstrated precisely why he did not need the first. Those few minutes endure because they contain the uncomfortable coexistence of brilliance and imperfection without allowing either to cancel the other. The second goal does not make the first legitimate, and the first does not make the second less extraordinary. We often prefer our heroes to be easier than this. We want greatness to arrive with virtue attached, as though extraordinary ability should naturally produce extraordinary character. When the two separate, we become uncomfortable and begin negotiating with ourselves. How much should genius excuse? Can admiration survive disappointment? Does an act of brilliance become smaller because of the person who produced it? His hand became one of football’s most recognisable symbols not because it represented greatness in any straightforward sense, but because it exposed the difficulty of separating greatness from the flawed person who possesses it. The same body that committed the infringement produced the second goal. The same imagination was capable of cunning and beauty. Michelangelo’s Adam presents another kind of human possibility. He lies upon the earth not yet fully animated, his hand extended towards the source of life. The gap between the fingers holds the promise of what humanity might become, but the image does not tell us what humanity will do with that gift. That belongs to everything that comes afterwards. This may be why the accidental dialogue between Michelangelo and Maradona is so compelling. One image belongs to a chapel and the other to a football stadium. One emerged from Renaissance theology; the other from a World Cup match charged with political memory. They should have almost nothing to say to one another, yet both became unforgettable because of a hand. Michelangelo gives us a hand at the beginning of human possibility. Maradona gives us a hand inside all the contradiction that follows: ambition, ingenuity, transgression and extraordinary ability compressed into a single gesture. Maradona’s story then gives us something Michelangelo’s fresco cannot: four minutes between the hand that should not have scored and the feet that proved he never needed it. Michelangelo left a tiny space between two fingers. History left four minutes between two goals.

Your cart is empty